With the exception of GT , which many fans don't consider canon, the tail never makes an appearance again. The Daizenshuu guide series clarifies that a tail will grow back if the Saiyan is in immediate danger, as we saw with Goku in Dragon Ball. The guide books were originally printed in , with an updated, more condensed version released in In Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot , it's explained that when a tail is cut off, there's an eight percent chance for it to grow back and that it won't grow back at all if the Saiyan surpasses the power of the Great Ape form without having transformed into it.
Therefore, if a Saiyan reaches Super Saiyan without being in Great Ape form, the tail won't grow back once being cut off. If they reach Super Saiyan while in Great Ape form, the tail has an eight percent chance to grow back. Since the latter information came from a video game released this year, it isn't clear whether this information is considered canon or not. A scientific basis for this could be that since both Vegeta and Goku married humans, the trait became recessive, and Gohan just so happened to have inherited it, while Trunks, Goten and Bulla didn't grow them.
If you have brown eyes and your spouse has blue eyes, then you have four children, there is a 25 percent chance that one of those children will have blue eyes since they are recessive.
Since there are four Saiyan-human hybrid children, it would make sense that at least one of them would have a tail if the gene became recessive. Keep me logged in on this device. Forgot your username or password? User Info: ssgvegeto ssgvegeto 1 year ago 4 In-Story : Bulma obviously wouldn't appreciate a rampaging Oozaru Trunks stomping her to death along with her house when a full moon strikes. User Info: raybull16 raybull16 1 year ago 5 Trunks was born without one.
User Info: toriyama-chan toriyama-chan 1 year ago 7 He literally said he forgot in an interview somewhere. Goku doesnt do big damn heroes. Do people really think Goten and Trunks are the same age as Caulifla and Kale?
Remember when 10 people spirit bomb made Trunks stronger than fusion? Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise including movies, spin-offs, etc.
Post by mictaliano » Fri Feb 24, am I don't know if this has been answered yet, but why did Gohan have a tail, but Goten and Trunks didn't? They are all 2nd generation saiyens! Has this been explained in the series in any way, shape or form? Post by B-kun » Fri Feb 24, am Toriyama stated their tails were removed at birth. Current fan theory is that he forgot about the tails and said that to clear his tracks.
Or maybe we're mean. But yeah, that's more or less the official answer. Son Gohan was born and Ox King was likely the only other person aside from his parents he saw for the first couple years of his life.
So no one who knew about Oozaru was around to say anything to them about it. By the time Son Goten and trunks came along, Bulma knew full well about Oozaru transformations. Chi-chi most likely knew as well perhaps Bulma or Gohan told her about the transformations. So story wise thier tails were most likely removed at birth for thier safety, the safety of others and for them to appear as normal humans and fit nto society better.
Vegeta was training fo the androids when Trunks was born and was not around to protest such a decision. Goku was dead when Goten was born and also had no say in the matter. Most likely a maternal decision on both counts. Post by Xyex » Fri Feb 24, am B-kun wrote: Toriyama stated their tails were removed at birth. Post by Duo » Fri Feb 24, am I could get into the whole science behind recessive traits and all that about this Post by Casual Matt » Fri Feb 24, pm Duo wrote: I could get into the whole science behind recessive traits and all that about this Post by Metrite » Fri Feb 24, pm I remember in the manga when Kuririn first met baby Trunks he asked what happened to his tail, but we don't get an answer I guess Toriyama just wanted to leave tells out of the picture and so decided to let everybody come up with their own reasons as to why Goku and Vegeta's tails never naturally came back and Goten and Trunks were never seen to have one.
In that one Shonen Jump that came out a few years ago he was asked why Goten and Trunks didn't have tails and he said, "It would seem tails are a recessive genetic trait. Post by Kaboom » Fri Feb 24, pm Yeah, recessive traits seem to be the best explanation. I'm no expert, but I'll see what I can say. Think about it this way; Gohan, Goten, and Trunks are each half-saiyan, half-human. They each have one fully Saiyan parent, with the genes for a tail, and one fully human parent, with no tail genes.
Gohan happened to land in the "tail" half, but Goten and Trunks didn't. A handy video guide to Kanzenshuu -level grammar quality!
0コメント